The Two Way Street

Politics for a New Generation


Leave a comment

Changing Elections, Changing Myself

This is me and my friend Kyle at the local campaign headquarters.

Within the walls of a dingy county Democratic headquarters, about 30 people sat talking on their cell phones. Fortunately, these were not the usual “Really? No she didn’t!!” conversations. Instead, we sat with lists of names and phone numbers in front of us, with an occasional age beside it. I looked down at the sheet I was sharing with my friend Kyle, scanning for a new Virginia voter to call. I read the number and carefully dialed it into my phone, then scanned the information. Linda* was 80-years old. I thought of my grandmother, a hardcore republican as the phone rang.

“Hello?” I hear the raspy voice of an elderly woman answer. This was the first time someone had actually picked up.

“Hi,” I said anxiously. “Is this Linda?”

When I confirmed that I had actually reached a human instead of getting stuck in yet another answering machine, or “voice jail” as my family calls it, I stumbled through the script. “My name is Julia I’m a volunteer leader with the grassroots campaign to reelect President Obama,” I read from the slip of paper, then threw in an awkward “How are you?”

After the curt small talk of two strangers, I asked her election plans. When she told me she was undecided, I figured that I had a chance to actually change something. “If I may, I’d like to explain to you why I support Obama, and why I’m putting in the time to volunteer tonight.”

We spoke for nearly ten minutes about Citizens United, and the financial situation of the elderly. I told her about my Grandma, a 70-something bus driver who cares for her 50-year-old son with down syndrome. Grandma has sleep apnea, false teeth, hip and knee replacements, and drags herself around the house to care for her middle-aged child and clean, all between a work schedule that requires her to get up at 5AM.

Even though Grandma didn’t know it, Obama’s policies had really helped her. She believed the forwarded emails that Obamacare was euthanasia, that the president was a secret Muslim, and even that he wasn’t born in the United States. However, she uses Medicare and Medicaid to get by, tax breaks for those with limited incomes, and a union that negotiates her pay as a public employee. And after several incidents in which her son Bobby injured himself while home alone, she even uses a government-supported daycare program for the mentally disabled.

I told Linda all this, but I didn’t have to: she could relate. She described her withering savings, and the fear that she might outlive the account. At 80 already, the notion of her returning to work seemed ridiculous, and yet, it seemed possible. Though the conventional wisdom is that people in tough economic situations vote out the incumbent, Linda decided not to join that trend. She felt that Romney would put CEOs before carpenters, bankers before bakers, and large dollar donors before the votes of the public. And, in a post-citizens’ united world, I think Linda was right.

And so, before getting off the phone, Linda pledged her vote to Obama, and I felt satisfied, knowing I had changed one mind. But more importantly, I was reminded that politics doesn’t have to be an issue of young versus old, black versus white versus Hispanic versus all the other little groups demographers ignore.  Though we probably disagreed about religion, gay rights, and the hot-button issues that politicize, that we could come together to help those in our society who needed it. Like my grandmother.

While we often attribute Obama’s presidency to young voters, we are unfortunately pretty unreliable making it to the polls. The most consistent age demographic to cast their ballot is the elderly, not the youth. And the younger generation has a duty to care for the elderly. I’m not one to sat that every person over a certain age has automatically earned a special “Wise Elder” status, but as my friend Ema depicted in a sculpture, we’re all afraid of being old, and losing the ability to care for ourselves. I go help my Grandma as often as I can, ignoring her comments about my hair, sexual orientation, and political identification. I just smile and vacuum her carpet, clean out her cabinets, wash her sinks.

I believe that Obama really is there for the elderly, and we should be too. We need to care for the older people in our lives, and insist that they be treated with basic respect and dignity. I love my Grandma, and Linda reminded me of how much help she needs, and how much she gets from a president she doesn’t support. Only in America…

*Name changed for privacy

Advertisements


1 Comment

Owning Th€ World

What do Ben Bernanke, Timothy Geithner, and Henry Paulsen have in common? All three either work, or formerly worked in government regulating the financial system in the last 10 years, Bernanke as the chairman of the Fed, and Paulsen and Giethner as treasury secretary. But there is one more thing, one key, disturbing detail one detail that suggests a silent conquest of financial control: all three, the three men tasked with the job of regulating our financial system, once worked for the financial firm Goldman & Sachs. Why is the financial system so difficult to regulate?

You may have heard of the recent supreme court descision allowing corporations to fund campaign commercials for or against political candidates. The supreme court made this descision based or first amendment rights, but what many fail to realize is that the power to purchase campaign ads  allows a corporation to bombard a candidate who crosses them with negative, slanderous campaign ads. Wealth, in america, is and always has been power. With a few exceptions, bills pass because they have money behind them, senators vote because their often covert corporate sponsors tell them to.

If the administrator of the EPA came straight from the coal industry, or or the head of the FDA was on the board of a major drug company, there would be political pandemonium. If a safety regulator had ties to the regulated, it would be considered a conflict of interest, and he or she wouldn’t be allowed to enter office. Then why would a big-money banker be allowed to regulate the financial system? We as a nation need to re-think financial regulation. The Federal Reserve and the Treasury are essentially the spleen of our financial system. Just as the spleen filters, produces, and holds a back up supply of blood, the Fed and Treasury are in charge of three jobs: s and holding a back up supply of money for cases of extreme emergency. Therefore, they play a vital role in regulating our financial system.

Some would argue that bankers would better understand the system, and therefore do a better job of regulating the system, but, a libertarian friend of mine once told me that the government is like an Umpire. It sets the rules, calls plays, and sees that the game is played fairly. If the Umpire begins playing the game, he told me, it then becomes a problem. He was correct, but he missed a key part: a biased Umpire. If an Umpire picks favorites, then the game instantly becomes less credible, lacking fair judgement. While he wouldn’t be playing the game, he certainly wouldn’t lack  a bias either.

The investment firm that Bernanke, Geithner, and Paulsen have in common is connected to a disturbing trend. Goldman & Sachs received the most bailout money of any firm, with a need for much less than many that did not receive as much. Goldman & Sachs also happens to habitually make large campaign contributions to politicians running for national office. With the new supreme court descision that companies can purchase campaign ads, what will stop investment from further exerting their control on the legislature, threatening negative ads and donations to the opposition of those who try to tighten the reigns? It is only a matter of time before Goldman & Sachs, truly owns the world.